Queen's University

Complaints about wind turbines and QAR coverage

Barrie Gilbert, Arts'62, offers a Wolfe Islander's perspective on wind turbines.

Re: “Queen’s Flag flies over Wolfe Island”  -- ISSUE #2-2012

When I read the promo for offshore wind turbines highlighting the accomplishments of two Queen’s engineering grads, I was reminded once again how limited is the technical “education” of engineers.

Wolfe Island wind turbines

As a recent Wolfe Island resident and retired university scientist I have spent five years attempting to point out the ­science-based ecological, economic and health risks of industrial scale wind turbines. The truth is that Wolfe Island’s 86 turbines, developed by Ian Baines, Sc’74, were erected in one of the worst places in ­Ontario for slicing into 20 million or so migrating birds twice a year and are now a constant source of mortality for resident wildlife.

Society needs more than wind-velocity data before projects like this proceed. Wind energy may be very profitable to developers (when subsidized by taxpayers), but the cumulative effects of upwards of 1,000 monster turbines proposed on- and off-shore in eastern Lake Ontario make them costly to energy ­consumers, nearby residents, and documented millions of birds that fly across Lake Ontario. The Lake is a natural resource for all of us, and it should be off-limits to damaging industrialization.

By the way ... the Review editor need not have apologized about “data” as singular. It is accepted both ways by The New York Times and the Oxford English Dictionary.

DR. BARRIE GILBERT, ARTS’62
WOLFE ISLAND, ON

Queen's Alumni Review, 2012 Issue #3Queen's Alumni Review
2012 Issue #3
Copyright © Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario, Canada. K7L 3N6. 613.533.2000
Last updated at 4:28 pm EDT, Thu April 17, 2014
iTunes is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.